How to Achieve Unbiased Hiring: Eliminate Assumptions

Discover strategies and best practices for minimizing assumptions and biases in the recruitment process. Create a more diverse, inclusive, and effective workforce.

Jun 17, 2024

∙ Paid

As recruiters, we play a crucial role in shaping the future of organizations by identifying and attracting top talent. However, our judgment can be influenced by assumptions and biases that we may not even be aware of. These unconscious biases can lead to missed opportunities, unfair evaluations, and a lack of diversity in the workplace.

Assumptions are a natural part of human cognition, helping us make sense of the world around us. In recruitment, however, relying too heavily on assumptions can have severe consequences. We may overlook qualified candidates, perpetuate stereotypes, or make decisions based on superficial characteristics rather than merit.

The impact of bias in hiring extends beyond individual candidates. It can affect the overall diversity and performance of an organization. Studies have shown that diverse teams are more innovative, make better decisions, and have a positive impact on the bottom line.

For example, a study by McKinsey & Company found that companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry medians.1

By allowing assumptions to guide our recruitment process, we risk missing out on these benefits. Research by Harvard Business Review revealed that diverse teams are more likely to remain objective, examine facts more carefully, and encourage greater scrutiny of each member's actions.2

Recognizing the presence of assumptions and biases is the first step toward creating a more equitable and effective hiring process. As recruiters, we have a responsibility to actively identify and address these issues. By implementing best practices and challenging our own assumptions, we can ensure that every candidate receives a fair evaluation based on their skills, experience, and potential.

The Influence of Assumptions on Recruiters

As humans, we are wired to make assumptions. Our brains constantly seek patterns and use mental shortcuts to process information quickly. While this can be helpful in many situations, it can also lead to unconscious biases that affect our decision-making.

Psychological research has shown that the human brain relies on heuristics, or mental shortcuts, to make quick judgments and decisions. While these heuristics can be efficient, they can also lead to cognitive biases that affect our perception, judgment, and decision-making3.

In the context of recruitment, these biases can manifest in various ways. We may make assumptions about a candidate's abilities based on their age, gender, or ethnicity. We might assume that a candidate who attended a prestigious university is more qualified than one who didn't. Or, we may favor candidates who share interests or experiences similar to our own.

These assumptions can lead us to overlook qualified candidates or give undue preference to others. They can also create a homogeneous workplace, where diversity of thought and background is lacking. As recruiters, it's essential to recognize that our assumptions can have real consequences for both candidates and the organization as a whole.

Unconscious biases are deeply ingrained and can be challenging to overcome. They are often the result of our upbringing, cultural background, and life experiences. However, by becoming aware of these biases and actively working to counteract them, we can make more objective and fair hiring decisions.

The first step is to acknowledge that we all have biases. It's not a matter of being a good or bad person; it's a matter of being human. By accepting this fact, we can open ourselves up to learning and growth. We can start to question our assumptions and look for ways to base our decisions on concrete evidence rather than gut instincts.

Common Biases in Recruitment

Recruitment is a complex process that involves evaluating candidates based on limited information. As a result, biases can easily creep in and influence our decisions.

Here are some of the most common biases in recruitment:

Resume bias: This occurs when we make judgments about a candidate based solely on the information in their resume. We may assume that a candidate with a gap in their employment history is less qualified, or that someone who has changed jobs frequently is unreliable. However, these assumptions may not be accurate and can lead us to overlook talented individuals.
Halo effect: The halo effect occurs when we assume that a candidate who excels in one area will excel in all areas. For example, we might assume that a candidate from a renowned company is automatically a good fit for our organization, without considering their specific skills and experience.
Confirmation bias: This bias occurs when we seek out information that confirms our pre-existing beliefs and ignore information that contradicts them. In recruitment, this can manifest as only asking questions that support our initial impression of a candidate, rather than seeking a well-rounded understanding of their qualifications.
Affinity bias: Affinity bias is the tendency to favor candidates who are similar to ourselves. This can be based on factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, or shared interests. While it's natural to connect with people who are like us, it's important to recognize that diversity of background and perspective can be a valuable asset to an organization.

These biases can be difficult to recognize and overcome, as they often operate on an unconscious level. However, by being aware of them and taking proactive steps to address them, we can make more objective and effective hiring decisions.

One way to combat these biases is to establish clear criteria for evaluating candidates before beginning the recruitment process. By defining the specific skills, experience, and qualities that are required for the role, we can create a more objective framework for assessment.

Another strategy is to involve multiple reviewers in the hiring process. By gathering input from a diverse group of individuals, we can reduce the impact of individual biases and gain a more well-rounded perspective on each candidate.

Removing Assumptions from Resume Review

A resume review is often the first stage of the recruitment process, and it's where many assumptions and biases can come into play. However, by implementing some simple strategies, we can minimize the impact of these biases and ensure a more objective evaluation of each candidate.

Creating a structured evaluation process: One of the most effective ways to remove assumptions from resume review is to create a structured evaluation process. This involves defining clear criteria for assessing candidates and using a consistent set of questions or scoring system to evaluate each resume. By following a structured process, we can ensure that all candidates are evaluated based on the same standards, rather than subjective impressions.
Focusing on relevant skills and experience: When reviewing resumes, it's important to focus on the skills and experience that are directly relevant to the role. This means looking beyond surface-level details such as the candidate's name, age, or gender, and instead assessing their qualifications objectively. By prioritizing relevant skills and experience, we can ensure that we are making decisions based on merit rather than assumptions.
Using blind hiring techniques: Blind hiring involves removing identifying information from resumes, such as the candidate's name, age, gender, or ethnicity. By doing so, we can evaluate each candidate based solely on their qualifications, without being influenced by unconscious biases.
A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that job applicants with white-sounding names receive 50% more callbacks for interviews than equally qualified applicants with African-American-sounding names.4
Taking names off resumes can help cut down on bias during your review process. While blind hiring may not be practical in all situations, it can be a powerful tool for reducing bias in the initial screening process.
Involving multiple reviewers: As mentioned earlier, involving multiple reviewers in the resume evaluation process can help to reduce the impact of individual biases. By gathering input from a diverse group of individuals, we can gain a more well-rounded perspective on each candidate and make more objective decisions.

Implementing these strategies can help to create a more fair and unbiased resume review process. However, it's important to recognize that removing assumptions is an ongoing effort.

Best Practices

Many recruiters in the industry have developed a range of strategies and best practices for minimizing bias and promoting fairness in the hiring process.

Here are some of their key insights:

Establishing clear criteria for evaluation: Before beginning the recruitment process, top recruiters work with hiring managers to establish clear criteria for evaluating candidates. This includes defining the specific skills, experience, and qualities that are required for the role, as well as any nice-to-have qualifications. By establishing these criteria upfront, recruiters can ensure a more objective and consistent evaluation process.
Conducting structured interviews: Structured interviews involve asking each candidate the same set of questions in the same order. This helps to reduce bias by ensuring that all candidates are evaluated based on the same criteria. Top recruiters often work with hiring managers to develop a set of standardized interview questions that are directly related to the job requirements.
Using objective assessments and work samples: In addition to interviews, top recruiters may use objective assessments and work samples to evaluate candidates' skills and abilities. For example, they may administer a coding test for a software engineering role or ask candidates to complete a writing assignment for a content creation position. These assessments provide concrete evidence of a candidate's capabilities and can help to reduce reliance on subjective impressions.
Providing bias training for all team members: Top recruiters recognize that bias is a systemic issue that requires ongoing education and awareness. They often provide training for all team members involved in the hiring process, including hiring managers and interviewers. This training may cover topics such as unconscious bias, inclusive language, and strategies for promoting diversity and equity in the workplace.

By implementing these best practices, top recruiters are able to create a more objective and inclusive hiring process.

If you enjoyed this newsletter, why not spread the love by sharing it with your friends and colleagues?

Removing Bias in Hiring

Creating an unbiased and inclusive hiring process is not only the right thing to do, but it also has significant benefits for both candidates and organizations.

For candidates, a fair and objective recruitment process means that they are evaluated based on their skills, experience, and potential, rather than superficial characteristics or assumptions. This can lead to greater diversity in the workplace, as candidates from underrepresented groups are given equal opportunities to showcase their abilities. It also helps to create a more positive candidate experience, as individuals feel valued and respected throughout the hiring process.

For organizations, unbiased hiring can lead to better outcomes in terms of employee performance, engagement, and retention. Research has shown that diverse teams are more innovative, make better decisions, and have higher levels of productivity than homogeneous teams. By removing biases from the recruitment process, organizations can tap into a wider pool of talented candidates and build teams that are better equipped to meet the challenges of a diverse and rapidly changing world.

As recruiters, we must continually challenge our own preconceptions and seek out new ways to promote fairness and inclusivity in our work. This may involve regular training and education, as well as a willingness to have difficult conversations about bias and discrimination.

Ultimately, creating an unbiased hiring process requires a commitment from all members of the organization, from leadership to individual contributors. By working together to identify and address biases, we can create a more equitable and inclusive workplace that benefits everyone.

As a recruiter, you have the power to make a significant impact on the lives of candidates and the success of your organization. By implementing the strategies and best practices outlined in this article, you can take proactive steps to remove assumptions from your hiring process and create a more fair and effective recruitment experience for all involved.